[- Communal histories - fact or friction?
|
|
By amy, Section editors' corner Posted on Sat Oct 18th, 2003 at 05:53:38 AM EURODISCORDIA TIME
|
Despite being one of the Discordia Developers, I have a mildy-infamous dislike of online discussion forums. Well, perhaps "despite" isn't the right word - my feelings as a type-B "pull" personality facing the type-A "push" world of contemporary list culture led me to lower-impact discussion settings like community weblogs.
But, what happens when online communities are used not for discussion, but for the writing of "history?" Can "everybody" write the history of the Apple Computer? What about the history of Internet art?
|
[ --------------------------------------------- ]
We know that the writing of a "history" is biased by who the writer is. And we know that online discussions are biased by who the people are who dominate the discussions - through social comfort levels, invitation/moderation/croneyism, access or other factors.
But what happens when we combine the two? When we open the writing of "history" to "everybody?" How will/do readers interpret the bias of these communal histories? (Related issues were also discussed recently in this nettime thread.)
It would also be interesting to hear if some of you decide to edit the two histories mentioned above. (For the Apple weblog you will need to make an account with them first; for the Wikipedia Internet Art page you can just edit it by clicking the "Edit this page" link at the top of that page.)
|
[ --------------------------------------------- ]
|
|