[- Geeks, Commerce, Politics, and Fun with Technology
|
|
By amy, Section review-a-rama Posted on Sat Feb 14th, 2004 at 04:19:22 AM EURODISCORDIA TIME
|
I've often wondered: could Southern California (or anywhere in the US) ever
have a cool geek conference like the Chaos Computer
Club holds in Berlin? I don't mean I expect the CCC to hold conferences
in the US rather than their home of Germany. I mean: could US computer culture
- steeped in pragmatism and capitalist necessity - ever support a geek conference
focused on politics and/or recreational hackerdom? After all, San Diego's infamous
annual hacker conference, ToorCon - isn't a
Hacker conference at all, it's an "Information Security" conference. There's
a big difference.
So, with a mix of high hopes and skepticism, I paid a visit this past week
to the O'Reilly Emerging
Technology Conference in San Diego.
|
[ --------------------------------------------- ]
O'Reilly seems to position itself as
a politically correct/aware publisher - as well as one who appreciates the fun
of geekdom - but not at the expense of business. The publicity for the conference
seemed to mimic this Jekyl-and-Hyde approach: a corporate structure of Keynotes,
Sessions, and expensive hotels and registration fees, juxtaposed with some politically-relevant
events like the
Digital Democracy Teach-in and a couple of collaborative mapping projects.
(The latter seem to be becoming ubiquitious, and I'm wondering why: are they
really helping "the people" map their environment in some useful or amusing
way? Or are the big winners Starbucks?) Anyway, unfortunately I was only able
to attend the conference on the last day, after these presumably-democratizing events had ended. But
from what I can tell, they only existed as side events in the lobby: the sessions
themselves seemed decidedly commercial/technical/pragmatic in nature. This is
no surprise, I guess, since the expensive registration fees were paid for most
attendees by their employers. But more unofficial politics emerged from the attendees
themselves: postings on the message board ranged from a handmade proposition
to organize geeks against Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's policies on home
health care to one sarcastically instructing hopeful job-seekers to Google for
the name of their desired job and the word "India."
But, commercio-technical though the sessions were, some not-so-conventional
spots managed to emerge:
* Electric Sheep. A project by Scott
Draves, it's a distributed screensaver project, along the lines of SETI@home
, but without the mission to hunt for extraterrestrials (or anything else.)
Electric Sheep's mission is to generate psychedelic graphic animations, and
users collectively vote for their favorites, which then are allowed to increasingly reproduce. A-Life computer art projects are of course nothing new, but Draves' perspective
- practical Darwinism applied to grooviness - is refreshing in its honesty about
doing nothing serious and important - it's A-Life just for kicks.
* Networked
Objects. Tom Igoe's presentation of some of his New York University students'
networked physical computing projects, including the E-mail
Clock (time marches on as the kilobytes fill your inbox), The Protest Button
(Floodnet style DOS attacks for street protesters - push a physical button instead
of clicking at your web browser) and the Sensing
Bed (feel your partner in bed when s/he is away - reminiscent of the infamous
FuckU-FuckMe.)
And, somehow an appropriate swan song, this talk during the last session of the
conference:
* CarBot. It's a car PC - not a new idea, admits
Los-Angeles based Damien Stolarz, its creator. But Stolarz takes an approach
rarely seen since the dot-com euporhia days, when tech startups believed they
could make money doing just about anything. Stolarz unabashedly designs Carbot
(price point still a mystery) for the gadget-head who has everything, and doesn't
worry about "what do you need *that* for?" - assuming instead that the uses
will emerge. So the CarBot has functions like reading your e-mail (and spam)
in an exotic female voice with a British accent (It makes spam much more enjoyable,
according to Stolarz.) Of course, CarBot is still a commercial product, whose
purpose is to make money, and whose inital target group is presumably the financially
well-off. But there's more to it than that: Carbot says a few things about the
culture that spawned it. Its mission is to provide a bittersweet sort of entertainment in their rolling
homes to Los Angelinos, who unfortunately often spend more waking hours in the car than in
their house or apartment. But it also harkens back to the paradoxically consumerist-yet-not-so-commercial
tech culture of the dot-com boom... when, despite (or because of) all the venture capitalists and materialist excess at its core,
tech culture seemed to have enough breathing room to actually be a culture, not just an industry.
So O'Reilly hasn't provided an American answer to the CCC conference, of course,
and it's unrealistic to expect that a corporation would. I still wonder though,
if non-corporate US tech culture could ever produce such a thing. Or if enough
non-corporate US tech culture still exists to do so - if it ever did. And if
someday soon, we'll be able to ride our Segways to our cars.
|
[ --------------------------------------------- ]
|
|